How the archive is organised online versus in the printed visit-letter
The QPass card archive is web-only by default — every card is on this site for subscribers at the Open Pass tier and above. The printed half-year visit-letter, which goes out in March and August, packages the most recent rotation cycle into a 24-page printed booklet for QPass Plus and Editor's Pass subscribers. The print version is the primary record for any cards that subsequently get revised — the rotation history is therefore visible across the printed run rather than overwritten on the web.
Each card on the online standing-sections pages carries the same text as the printed version, plus the post-publication corrections appended at the foot. The cards do not expand for the web. Field photographs that did not fit the printed plate run sometimes appear online as additional figures, but the text is identical. Press citation should reference the printed issue and card number (e.g. "Mostafa, K., 'The Egyptian Museum, Tahrir, after the move,' QPass Museum Cards & Reviews, spring 2026 visit-letter, card 047").
The corrections workflow — what keeps the archive honest
Every cycle the printed visit-letter carries a four-page reader-correction column at the front. The column is the working mechanism by which the archive stays honest across the inter-rotation window. Subscribers write to the desk to flag closures, restoration changes, ticket-price adjustments, factual errors, or developments that change the editorial line in a previously-published card. The corrections are sorted by Nadia Tantawy, the fact-checker, verified independently by the responsible editor, and merged into the next printed visit-letter with the subscriber's name (unless they prefer anonymity) and the date of the original observation.
The single most important consequence of the column is the conversation it produces between subscribers and the desk. Across the publication's history we have published 167 named corrections — that is, an average of about fourteen per cycle. Some are minor (a wrong ticket price, a moved café), most are substantive (a closed tomb, a re-rotation in a museum hall, a security adjustment at a site), and a few have changed the editorial line on a long-running question. The column is also the part of the publication that QPass Plus and Editor's Pass subscribers most often mention as the part they look forward to.
How a single card is produced
Many readers ask what goes into producing a single QPass card. The honest answer is that the format is built around discipline. Each card represents two editor visits to the site, one fact-checking pass by Nadia, and one editorial review by Kareem before publication. The total time investment per card is around ten to fifteen editor-hours across the two visits, the fact-check and the review. For a small archive of 118 cards across 36 sites, the workload is what four full-time editors can sustain without sacrificing the rotation cadence. We do not see this format scaling to a thousand cards without losing the rotation discipline; the archive will probably plateau somewhere around 160 cards over the next two rotation cycles.
The first visit is reconnaissance — the editor buys a ticket at the standard adult rate, walks the site at the published opening time, and takes notes. Nothing is written on the first visit. The second visit happens two to six weeks later, on a different day of the week and at a different time. This is the visit that produces the photograph and the draft card. The draft goes to Nadia for fact-checking — she verifies every claim against her register of standing claims across the archive (opening hours, ticket prices, named restaurants, named guides). Discrepancies are resolved with the responsible editor, sometimes with a third site visit if the contested fact is unclear. The approved card is then scheduled into the next publication slot — Sunday morning for new cards, Wednesday morning for corrections.